Friday 20 July 2007

A merging question…


“…the process could evaporate off their technical staff…”



Is it healthy for us to absorb one of our collaborators/competitors as a simple donor to our projects/partners?

On the one hand:

· it could reduce our cumulative bureaucratic load,

· it is a positive sign in an all-too-often cynical and fragmentary world,

· it could allow them to focus on core skills of fund-raising and us on programme delivery.

On the other hand:

· we have lower field supervision expectations than they presently do; can they accept this as ‘progress’ or will they want us to increase our supervisory intensity?

· will they maintain their technical inputs to projects they support as supernumerary to our overheads, or will they attempt to subtract them from our overheads – in effect removing our leeway to manage as we see fit; who will end up controlling whom?

· the process could evaporate off their technical staff; and if this happens, will we have won or lost?

· will the process also drive away their own current partners, unwilling to partner us now, or unhappy at not having been consulted?